Attention loyalty program marketers. Let’s lift our game.
This may be read as a rant.
I prefer you understood it as a call to action.
If you are a marketer of any type of loyalty or rewards program (see definition at end of article), then please spend a few more moments reviewing this article and consider the actions you can to take to drive the long-term value and viability of your program.
There are many factors that impact the success of a loyalty program, however the
For Love or MoneyTM 2019 research reveals two issues that I believe need the attention and focus of loyalty programs marketers.
Issue one impacting the value and viability of programs: ACTIVITY
- Activity: While memberships of programs remains steady, there has been a decline in ‘active participation’ in programs and the lowest since 2015. * An active member in the research was defined as ‘having presented their card or membership number when making a purchase in the last 12 months’
- ‘Activity’ has declined from 59% (2015) to 47% (2019).
Issue two impacting the value and viability of programs: DATA
- Loyalty program data collection and use: a privacy and trust issue: For the first time in the For Love or MoneyTM ongoing research studies, we looked deeper into loyalty program data collection and use.
- The research reveals members are concerned about the collection, security and use of their loyalty program data.
I’ll address both 1. and 2.
Volume is for vanity. Activity is for sanity
While a volume of members is a success factor (no members, no program), scaled activity is the first indication of a members’ interaction with a program.
Whether it is a purchase or a defined program action eg redemption of a reward, if there is a depth of activity (by whatever definition assigned), then that’s great.
If they are not active, then why not?
While there are more measures of a program’s health that can go deeper and further, activity is a simple metric to start the process of improvement.
How do you improve activity?
If you choose to start somewhere, start with a deep look at your members and their appetite for your program’s proposition as opposed to your business offering.
Note: When working through the reasons for inactivity, bear in mind this is program specific as there may be other reasons outside the circle of a program’s influence eg service, price, competitive activity that have impacted on inactivity.
- Who is active and why? What action are they taking that defines them as ‘active’.
- Who is inactive and why? How long for?
Identify why they are inactive. Member behaviour analysis will tell you the past behaviour, may also be able to predict future behaviour and research from the members point of view will add another layer of insight.
If you choose to do research with your inactive members, dissect your program’s proposition (whatever structure and benefit mix it has) and ask why members do not find them appealing.
A program needs to be SPV (my mantra) = Simple. Personal. Valuable. Beneath each are a blend of benefits as highlighted in the For Love or MoneyTM study. (Transactional; Experiential; Utility; Personal; Social). Review each with relevance to what you can deliver and what your members desire.
When you know why members are inactive, you can take action to improve.
Call to action: Please improve ‘activity’!
P.S. Motivating reward redemption increases activity - case in point is the recent Qantas Frequent Flyer revamp - "Since the changes were announced there has been a 25 per cent increase in points redemption flight bookings from members who had never used points to get a seat before, a 20 per cent increase in international economy bookings using points and a 40 per cent increase in international business reward seat bookings, compared with the same time last year."
The loyalty program data value-exchange is at a precarious inflection point
We need to change our approach. Currently, I see it as the givers and takers.
At the moment of value exchange - members give their data in exchange for a benefit and programs take the data in exchange for giving that benefit.
Let’s reframe that.
At the moment of value exchange – members give their data in exchange for a benefit and for the promise of personalisation and relevance to who they are and what they want.
- They also give their data with the inherent trust that the program will take care of their data and use it to enhance their experience, not invade their privacy.
At the moment of value exchange - programs need to accept the data with respect and sensitivity, telling members why they are asking for their data, how they will use it and how secure it will be.
So, it’s simple.
Firstly, programs need to be more transparent with the collection and use of a member’s data.
The top 3 are:
- Knowing how secure my data is
- Knowing how my data is being used
- The reputation of the company asking for my data
Review all the factors and take steps to be transparent on all.
Secondly, once data is gained, programs need to deliver on the promise of the personal in personalisation with an overlay of relevance (message and timing).
No more one size fits all batch and blast.
Call to action: Please respect your members data. Please power up the ‘personal’ with relevance.
In summary, the time is now for loyalty program marketers to lift their game on activity and data.
if we start with these, there are sure to be incremental improvements to the longer-term sustainability of loyalty programs as a valuable and viable asset to a business and a relevant and valuable benefit to their members.
If you’ve read this far, then I am sure you have a point of view on the contents of this article – please share your views.
Have a happy loyalty day!
Definition of a loyalty program:
“A defined structure of rewards and recognition designed by a business to enhance a member’s life (emotionally, financially & with simplicity) in exchange for desired behaviours that benefit profitable business growth (income, insight and advocacy)”.
Adam Posner – The Point of Loyalty